Page 1 of 1

Best rating?

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 1:52 pm
by 486 player
Should there be only one, or are current 2 ok?

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 12:45 pm
by Annorax
I would say the 0-100%, since it's easy to use and very precise.

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:37 pm
by johpower
For overall, I like 0-5 stars (boy are there a few 0 star games.... :laugh: )

But for the detailed examinations, 0-10 or percentile ratings are prefered, with appropriate editorial.

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 5:03 pm
by Dogbreath
The problem here is 0 is the lowest score allowed...

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 6:33 pm
by Splodginator
I think stars are the best way to rate games, because you don't need to calculate too much, and its mostly an approximation. Although, when you wan't to use normal, symbolic stars for the ratings...

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 7:02 pm
by Dogbreath
IT WAS ARD! I GAB IT 5 TARS!!!!

ImageImageImageImageImage

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 8:09 pm
by Da_Goat
1.0, 1.1...-...9.9, 10.0 is the best, in my opinion.

stars

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 10:37 pm
by Wally
stars is the best system. you can count the stars in halves or quaters so yeah

....

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:29 pm
by Dogbreath
Hmmm... that was a 3-star reply.

ImageImageImage

LOL

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 9:11 pm
by Wally
YAY!!!!!
3 stars is ok but i would rather about 4 stars

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:32 am
by Guest
0-10

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:47 am
by The Unknown
Guess this poll is over so let me add a new topic to it

A banning streak is apon us look out all
because you could be NEXT!

Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 9:07 pm
by cramhains
Dogbreath wrote:Hmmm... that was a 3-star reply.

ImageImageImage
That is very funny I'll give a 5 star.
ImageImageImageImageImage

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:06 pm
by Dark Lord
I'd say the best is 0-100 because it offers a wider range so you don't have to type 8.94174967396 to prove how exact you think it is.