Page 1 of 3
I-touch or i-pod classic
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:22 pm
by SpaceFans
Which one would you rather have????
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:38 am
by dosraider
None of them.
Not my stuff.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:03 am
by Wally
iPod touch mate, if you can just get the iPhone. Its a phone too!
Unless you need more space then the iPod Classic.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:00 am
by GAMER
I have a Zen Neeon. It's kind of cool.
GAMER
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:35 am
by emmzee
The iTouch is a pretty slick gadget, but its ridiculously expensive. The 8gb iTouch costs more than the 80gb classic.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:40 am
by SpaceFans
Yea I know what you mean Buddy
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:10 pm
by Ro@m
None of the both...
I would recommend Creative ZEN Vision:M,Creative ZEN 32Gb(first 32 Gb flash player in world,you can get it really cheap over Dell) or the Creative ZEN V Plus 16Gb
Personally i would recommend the ZVP cause i have the 1Gb model and it is simple fantastic....
Iyou watch videos more then listen to mp3's take the ZEN 32Gb,and if you're 50/50 then take the ZVM,cause the ZVP is more for the shorter video clips then long movies.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:17 pm
by Wally
What's the point of getting a Zen if an iPod Nano Classic holds more space for the same amount of money?
lol
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:23 pm
by Ro@m
Damn you Apple users! Yarrrghhh..
Anways,iPod is sooo worn out to me,everyone has it....
And the point is ZEN is more cool then apple...
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:23 pm
by GAMER
Mmm.
It's debatable.
I like my ZEN...but it's definitely not as "flowy" as the ipods.
I like that you can delete songs straight off the gadget though, instead of plugging it into the puter.
GAMER
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:01 am
by dosraider
Hmmmm, I could begin about Mac and money greedy.
Apple and product monopoly.
Apple and product protection.
Apple and non-compatibilty with others to protect their cash flow.
Something as 'Apple-Mac' is EVIL.
But I won't do it.
Really not.
But of course, suddenly now that they can make money they release PC compatible software so that all those yuppies can download songs.
Ow, I said I won't discuss this again, sorry folks, simply ignore me.
@ Wally.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:56 am
by cyb3r.god3
the main reason im getting neither is itunes, the piece of absolute *insert all swears known to mankind*
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:58 pm
by Ro@m
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:06 pm
by CPT Worm
I use a Zen Stone because I'm a cheap bastard. It's really incompatible with my iMac. Awesome.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:15 pm
by emmzee
I'm using this cheap-ass thing until it breaks:
http://www.pny.com/products/digitalent/
I've had it for 2 yrs now and it still works so ... *shrugs* Good 'nuff for now ... shmaybe an ipod in the future? (Prolly not tho ...)
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:24 pm
by Wally
dosraider wrote:Hmmmm, I could begin about Mac and money greedy.
Apple and product monopoly.
Apple and product protection.
Apple and non-compatibilty with others to protect their cash flow.
Something as 'Apple-Mac' is EVIL.
But I won't do it.
Really not.
But of course, suddenly now that they can make money they release PC compatible software so that all those yuppies can download songs.
Ow, I said I won't discuss this again, sorry folks, simply ignore me.
@ Wally.
What about Microsoft then eh, Microsoft just try to copy apple and make everything look good except they just make it all look crap. The Zune and Windows Vista for example are infact Clones of the iPod and Mac OS X
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:29 pm
by dosraider
Microsoft sux, of course.
What you thought?
Doesn't diminish the fact that Mac sux.
Clones? In your dreams.
MS copies Mac?
That's the most stupid saying that exists.
Put a MAc user on a PC and he's completely lost.
Put a MS user on a Mac and he's completely lost.
You could also say that VW is cloning Toyota, they both have four wheels.
MS OS are running on Intel architecture and Mac OS runs on ... OOOOOooooh wait a sec .....
<img src="
http://www.opensmiley.info/smiley/classique/0192.gif">
Point is: Mac sux.
And if your only reply is that MS sux, so be it. I don't care, I even agree with that.
But MS sux for half the $$$$ that the Mac does.
LMAO.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:40 pm
by Wally
Hmm Why is leopard much cheaper than vista ultimate then
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:00 pm
by dosraider
Because it sux even more then Vista.
And of course you pay twice too much for your hardware.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:32 pm
by Wally
Leopard sucks... on vista's supply..
Microsoft were even saying "the world isnt ready for vista", how screwed do they want to get hm?
Microsoft ALSo have Steve Ballmer:devil:, we have Steve Jobs
.