Page 11 of 52

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 8:58 am
by denrix
plus, every thread in this forum is chock full of swearing. dont be bitchy about it. we're canadians! we dont care about swearing! B)

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 11:01 am
by Thundermutt
dnirex wrote:plus, every thread in this forum is chock full of swearing. dont be bitchy about it. we're canadians! we dont care about swearing! B)
Not every thread. Just any thread that has a reply by you. Jackass.

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 11:53 am
by Dogbreath
WE WOULDN'T BE BAN EVADING NOW, WOULD WE?

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:39 am
by Da_Goat
You're allowed to swear as long as it's not directed at a certain person, as dnirex's comment was.

And stop the flames. I got a complaint PM about 'em.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:48 am
by Check-Mate
Uh. Just one question, DB....why exaclty IS TD banned, anyways?

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:59 am
by Splodginator
He'd had enough of Wally asking?

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 1:01 pm
by Kazer0
dnirex wrote:plus, every thread in this forum is chock full of swearing. dont be bitchy about it. we're canadians! we dont care about swearing! B)
Your not Canadian stupid. It takes 4 years to get a Canadian citizenship.

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:04 pm
by Thunderdog_Will_Maim_You
*Check-Mate* wrote:Uh. Just one question, DB....why exaclty IS TD banned, anyways?
And I quote his Unholy words from a PM I just recieved:

[snippage of confidencial things by Kazer0]

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:09 pm
by Dogbreath
It's okay, K0, let him quote it. Hell, I'll do it, it'll explain why:
Dogbreath wrote:
Actually, the only reason you haven't seen me on AIM is because we haven't been on AIM at the same time since New Years... I've been wanting to talk to you for a while. (FWIW, I have *NEVER* blocked you intentionally. Though there was that time a year ago AIM blocked you automatically for a month before I found out about it-are you sure that I'm not on your block list?)

[In a message I sent a few mintutes ago after I got back from my haircut I told him next time he was on AIM I'd work out some probation system]
Thunderdog_Will_Maim_You wrote: I can't stand to see Dnirex's Idiocy plauge this board.

The reason you were banned wasn't primarily because of you breaking the law (though that was a good incentive, especially because Tony Montana was threatening to report you to authorities and I really didn't want this board mixed up in any legal difficulties) , but because I can't stand to see *your* idiocy plauge this board. We had just instituted a new rule system and within a day you managed to break every other rule we have. You don't contribute anything but flames and hatered to conversations anymore and seem to believe you are somehow set apart from any other member and that the rules don't apply to you. Why the fuck do you have to be such a dick to everyone on the board? Why do you hate Dnirex? Why can't you ever control your hate and show some respect for our rules and *stop* being such a total dipshit?
There, happy?

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:41 pm
by Check-Mate
uuhhh....That cleared it up. Yeah. And, Sorry TD, but DB does have a point. Although TD doesn't always flame and stuff. He does help people too. Anyways, it's what he calls humour. (Remember, anti-social. ;) )

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:48 pm
by denrix
Kazer0 wrote:Your not Canadian stupid. It takes 4 years to get a Canadian citizenship.
3

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 10:31 pm
by Check-Mate
From the TD's mouth itself:
Thunderdog wrote:There is no rule against "Hacking" in the rules topic.
*Sasha has read the rules, so she agrees with that*

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 10:57 pm
by Splodginator
Never mind, I read the rest, its confined to posting. And TD sort of has a point, people complain about Dnirex on GameHippo too, but usually only about his outrageously large signature pictures.

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 6:00 am
by Thunderdog_Will_Maim_You
*Check-Mate* wrote:uuhhh....That cleared it up. Yeah. And, Sorry TD, but DB does have a point. Although TD doesn't always flame and stuff. He does help people too. Anyways, it's what he calls humour. (Remember, anti-social. ;) )
Well, I guess if I dont have your support, I'm out, then. It was a pleasure to meet you all.....Except dnirex.

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 10:20 am
by denrix
well, if it wasnt such a pleasure for you to meet me, then why do you always greet me on AIM every time you logon, and why do you insist on playing game after game of Soldat? :blah:

and, JFYI, Frog, only you and a couple of other fascists complain about my sig:

Image

I'm asking you people, is this sig too big?!

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 3:41 pm
by Dogbreath
Thunderdog wrote:
There is no rule against "Hacking" in the rules topic.



*Sasha has read the rules, so she agrees with that*
5. Enforcement Of These Rules

a. If you have a disagreement with any of these rules please contact an administrator.
b. Keep in mind that sabotaging or editing the content of these boards through illegal means (i.e., hacking) is not only in violation of these rules but is also in violation of international law. It's not a game and it's not funny-just illegal.
:rolleyes:

Dnirex: No, but it looks to be pretty damn stupid...

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:23 pm
by denrix
did you notice the expression in his face! magnificient!

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:45 pm
by Splodginator
I'm asking you people, is this sig too big?!
It would be to tall if the Forum Rules had any regulations about the size of an signature picture, like Soldat's Forums.

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 7:49 pm
by Check-Mate
Thunderdog_Will_Maim_You wrote:
*Check-Mate* wrote:uuhhh....That cleared it up. Yeah. And, Sorry TD, but DB does have a point. Although TD doesn't always flame and stuff. He does help people too. Anyways, it's what he calls humour. (Remember, anti-social. ;) )
Well, I guess if I dont have your support, I'm out, then. It was a pleasure to meet you all.....Except dnirex.
I never said you didn't have my support. You do. I'm just saying...you do things like that. I always laugh at your little comments. That's why I said you call it humour. I'm laughing.

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 1:25 am
by Kazer0
It would be to tall if the Forum Rules had any regulations about the size of an signature picture, like Soldat's Forums.
It did, but then DB made me edit that rule out when I was making revisions. (I wrote the base rules, then we revised them a few times and DB posted them (He didnt even let me have the glory of posting...))