oh boy! Oh Boy! OH BOY!!!
- Larry Laffer
- Admin
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:06 am
- Location: Romania
oh boy! Oh Boy! OH BOY!!!
STARCRAFT II... it's coming and it's for sure!
Today, at WWI(that's World Wide Invitational, ye noobs) in Korea, Blizzard announced the coming of the sequel, after almost a decade, we got ourselves a Starcraft Sequel!
And since I know I got your attention, haul your browser to Blizzard.com
*I might actually buy mehself a new computer for this baby!
[edit]: I'm so hyper I forgot to mention www.starcraft2.com
Today, at WWI(that's World Wide Invitational, ye noobs) in Korea, Blizzard announced the coming of the sequel, after almost a decade, we got ourselves a Starcraft Sequel!
And since I know I got your attention, haul your browser to Blizzard.com
*I might actually buy mehself a new computer for this baby!
[edit]: I'm so hyper I forgot to mention www.starcraft2.com
<center>
ModBot™ - Faster than the speed of spam!(and always taking it to where it belongs!)
</center>abyss wrote:I don't even know if starcraft 1 was a windows or dos games.
ModBot™ - Faster than the speed of spam!(and always taking it to where it belongs!)
Congrats I was personally hoping for Diablo III (I never really play RTS games), but most people were 99% sure it was going to be SC2. (That's StarCraft, not Star Control ) Hope it comes out sooner rather than later ...
Owner / Webmaster of DOSGames.com for over 20 years
Download my free ebook: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
Download my free ebook: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
That's pretty hard to believe... I mean, I hate RTS games with a passion (for the most part) and even I know what Starcraft 1 was.abyss wrote:I never seen pics or played starcraft 1 before. I don't even know if starcraft 1 was a windows or dos games.
I'm really not excited about it at all, I saw some screenshots of it and it pretty much looks like the original one, but with slightly upped graphics. It looks like it would run fine on a P2. lol. They should have made one like C&C Renegades or w/e it was called.
- Dogbreath
- Admin
- Posts: 4620
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 7:02 pm
- Location: In the back of a jacked-up Ford.
Anyone want to claim this one for the quote?abyss wrote:I don't even know if starcraft 1 was a windows or dos games.
Anyway, Starcraft is the second best selling computer game of all time, next to the Sims. It's sold some 9.5 million copies, and has probably been pirated or borrowed by hundreds of millions of people.
- Larry Laffer
- Admin
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:06 am
- Location: Romania
MINE!Dogbreath wrote:Anyone want to claim this one for the quote?abyss wrote:I don't even know if starcraft 1 was a windows or dos games.
<center>
ModBot™ - Faster than the speed of spam!(and always taking it to where it belongs!)
</center>abyss wrote:I don't even know if starcraft 1 was a windows or dos games.
ModBot™ - Faster than the speed of spam!(and always taking it to where it belongs!)
I have a legit copy of Starcraft and the add-ons, its a fun game. The best RTS game in my opinion is still Age of Empires 2.
While Starcraft II looks interesting, most of the RTS lately are all eye candy with small maps that don't have very many units on them. Look at how many 2D enemies were in a room in DOOM2 and compare that to DOOM3, less action but more eye candy (atleast untill we have 20Ghz CPUs and Video cards with 2' deep heatsinks).
While Starcraft II looks interesting, most of the RTS lately are all eye candy with small maps that don't have very many units on them. Look at how many 2D enemies were in a room in DOOM2 and compare that to DOOM3, less action but more eye candy (atleast untill we have 20Ghz CPUs and Video cards with 2' deep heatsinks).
-
- Expert
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:58 am
- Larry Laffer
- Admin
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:06 am
- Location: Romania
- Dogbreath
- Admin
- Posts: 4620
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 7:02 pm
- Location: In the back of a jacked-up Ford.
I'm not really a fan of the whole RTS genre, at least not the Starcraft -esque games where you start out on a (relatively) small map, and pretty much every mission consists of gathering resouces, building base, gathering resources, building an overwealming force, attack enemy, repeat. It's not bad if you're playing online against another person, but the missions from Starcraft got very repetative.
I prefer strategy games like Civilization or Masters of Orion or Alpha Centauri or Empire of the Fading Suns or even Alien Legacy... games where you do quite a bit of exploring along with building, where you can build a nation from scratch and control everything.
I will admit that Age of Empires 2 is my favorite RTS, though. IMO, they handled the "small map scenarios" very very well. You have to advance through 4 "ages", each of which contains different units and gameplay strategy. You can literally build your own city, complete with commons, marketplaces, walls, guard towers, castles, and churches. It had a fairly complex alliance structure, and trade is very well done. Definately a step beyond the whole "build a base as fast as you can" atmosphere of Starcraft.
It still has one thing that really bothers me, though. You can only ever win or lose missions. Your progress in the past mission has no influence on the next one, other than allowing you to access it. I never liked games like that, where you feel like you've being pulled along at the end of the line, and nothing you do can change anything significant.
I prefer strategy games like Civilization or Masters of Orion or Alpha Centauri or Empire of the Fading Suns or even Alien Legacy... games where you do quite a bit of exploring along with building, where you can build a nation from scratch and control everything.
I will admit that Age of Empires 2 is my favorite RTS, though. IMO, they handled the "small map scenarios" very very well. You have to advance through 4 "ages", each of which contains different units and gameplay strategy. You can literally build your own city, complete with commons, marketplaces, walls, guard towers, castles, and churches. It had a fairly complex alliance structure, and trade is very well done. Definately a step beyond the whole "build a base as fast as you can" atmosphere of Starcraft.
It still has one thing that really bothers me, though. You can only ever win or lose missions. Your progress in the past mission has no influence on the next one, other than allowing you to access it. I never liked games like that, where you feel like you've being pulled along at the end of the line, and nothing you do can change anything significant.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:58 am
- Larry Laffer
- Admin
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:06 am
- Location: Romania
Well nobody questions people's taste when it comes to gaming, you know, I mean I may like to play [insert name of game really crappy and really hated by the gaming communities world-wide] every now and then, but nobody forces, say, you! to also like it!
<center>
ModBot™ - Faster than the speed of spam!(and always taking it to where it belongs!)
</center>abyss wrote:I don't even know if starcraft 1 was a windows or dos games.
ModBot™ - Faster than the speed of spam!(and always taking it to where it belongs!)
Probably not a big surprise, but Starcraft II won't be coming out this year:
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/31/no-st ... this-year/
Judging by Blizzard's history, it'll probably be late 2008 at earliest ...
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/31/no-st ... this-year/
Judging by Blizzard's history, it'll probably be late 2008 at earliest ...
Owner / Webmaster of DOSGames.com for over 20 years
Download my free ebook: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
Download my free ebook: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
- Thunderdog
- <b>Token Black Guy</b>
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 9:25 pm
- Larry Laffer
- Admin
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:06 am
- Location: Romania