Big troubles with a 286

fabiobol · Post by **fabiobol** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:11 am

i have a AMD 286-16 Mhz, 3 MB RAM, 200 MB HD and video cirrus logic. I have a lot of troubles with this machine: first, the keboard seems to write the characters on the screen very very late on windows 3.1 (but not in dos); second, I don't know what vga is installed. windows recognise it as a VGA, but on the chip it's written cirrus logic (there are 2 video chips!!!), and in windows i can't use 256-colours! In dos, with games like Winter challenge, the video card is soo slow!!! Also, i have a modem installed, I tried to install internet explorer 1,2,3,4,5 for win3.1, but it makes ALWAYS an application error! Then, i have installed 4 1 MB slots of ram, but it seems to see only 3 of them.
And, last, I can't play commander keen 4, doom 1 and 2, big red racing and a lot of other games don't work! Could you help me? Thanks!

dr_st · Post by **dr_st** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:29 pm

You're not supposed to play DOOM on a 286. I think it has 386 in its min. requirements. Heck, you're not supposed to do anything on a 286!

wild_qwerty · Post by **wild_qwerty** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:57 pm

286s were a bit before my time but....

Doom - minimum spec of at least a 386 (everyone went uot and bought a 486 though!)
RAM - check them in different combinations in case one of the chips is faulty

Post by **Wally** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:36 pm

DONT install windows..... and download freedos!

I do suggest tossing the 286 and getting a better machine

Unknown_K · Post by **Unknown_K** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:21 am

Windows 3.0 was the last to run on a 286 correctly I think. IE explorer most likely needs 386 protected mode to work (386 or better)

Frenkel · Post by **Frenkel** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:21 am

Win 3.1 runs on a 286, Win 3.11 doesn't.

Commander Keen 4 should work. Doom 1, 2 and 3 and Big Red Racing all need a 386 or higher.

fabiobol · Post by **fabiobol** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:57 am

You 're all right! I have to buy a "new" old-computer! I live in Italy, so tomorrow there is a fair near Milan, then I will go and I will buy a 486DX2/66 MHz, some video cards, some audio cards (what about the YAMAHA OPL-3 and the ESS-1868 for dos games?) and a lot of motherboard for Pentium and K6 CPUs. But.... is there any way to emulate on a 286 the 386 processor? I read that on many sites, and they all said about an EMULATOR that, of course, emulates the 386 CPU and the co-processor. I tried one of them but unfortunately it didn't work and my 286 is making me very, very angry, because I can't do about nothing!!!!

Dosser · Post by **Dosser** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 11:17 am

I wouldn't think do: emulation typically takes a lot of CPU power. You are basically asking your computer to emulate a much more powerful processor.

fabiobol · Post by **fabiobol** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 2:51 pm

Very good. Tomorrow I will buy a 486!

GameMaster.EXE · Post by **GameMaster.EXE** » Wed Jun 29, 2005 2:50 pm

I'm using a 486. 386 was the standard for Windows 3.1. It will be a matter of time before we see 586.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:06 am

586 was the 1st Pentium generation.

Post by **dosraider** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:15 am

GameMaster.EXE wrote:I'm using a 486. 386 was the standard for Windows 3.1..............

Win 3.x is a GUI for dos....NOT an OS !!!
Delete your dos and win 3.x won't even run.
Graphical
User
Interface
yes ?

dr_st · Post by **dr_st** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:58 pm

To some extent, Win95 and Win98 are also but GUIs for DOS. They are more autonomous than Win3.11 and take over more stuff, but they still won't run without the DOS core under them.

Post by **dosraider** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 4:28 pm

Fully agree with that.
It was only a reply to GameMaster.EXE 's statement, he give me the impression he consider Windows 3.1. as a full OS, concived for a 386 cpu.
Or something..........hmmm.

Frenkel · Post by **Frenkel** » Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:31 pm

EMU386 emulates real mode 386 on a 286.

I've never ran Win3.x in 256 colors.

GameMaster.EXE · Post by **GameMaster.EXE** » Mon Jul 11, 2005 2:23 pm

dosraider wrote:Fully agree with that.
It was only a reply to GameMaster.EXE 's statement, he give me the impression he consider Windows 3.1. as a full OS, concived for a 386 cpu.
Or something..........hmmm.

Why the hell would I think that? Windows 3.1 needs dos just to show it's puny face!! I think what I was trying to say was that if dos was the only OS on your system, a 386 cpu is needed to install and run Windows 3.1. Windows XP is a complete OS, with no needed dos support.

GameMaster.EXE · Post by **GameMaster.EXE** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:15 am

486 player wrote:586 was the 1st Pentium generation.

80586?!?

Frenkel · Post by **Frenkel** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:56 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/80586

GameMaster.EXE · Post by **GameMaster.EXE** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:05 pm

GameMaster.EXE wrote:
486 player wrote:586 was the 1st Pentium generation.
80586?!?

Hey! nobody told me they a 586

"1st Pentium Generation?" I think 486 player is talking about 8586

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 1:16 pm

Looks like it.